In the Kenyatta and Moi era, it was almost treasonable to claim that people had died of hunger. There is no such fear in these democratic and ICT days.
Politicians and lobbyists nowadays use every method possible to highlight their people's suffering. In an area prone to regular droughts, it is inevitable that relief food will affect the politics of the day.
This, then, is the background to that horror story of a family eating dog meat in Loima Division. Turkana Professional Association (TPA), in their internet blog, almost unanimously dismiss the story as a fabrication that discredits the image of a proud, pastoralist community.
The story may shock the nation into action, but it only compounds negative public perceptions about the community. The media are only too willing to present images of starving Turkanas that does a great injustice to a community who are not short of heroes and heroines.
So if the meat story is unrepresentative, then where does the truth lie? Certainly efforts by the World Food Programme (WFP) to distribute food in Turkana Central have been frustrated since July due to insistence by the local MP that Kenya Red Cross become the leading agency in the distribution.
Again, the Friends of Lake Turkana (Folt) have raised the alarm over the $1.7 billion Gibe III Dam constructed on the River Omo that threatens the livelihoods of 20,000 fishermen. The water level of Lake Turkana is expected to drop by 12 metres with the construction and the Samburu, Gabra and Rendille communities will be equally affected.
Two days ago, Folt led a protest to the Chinese Embassy in Nairobi who are funding the project. The march had little political support. Roads, resources, minerals and infrastructure offer great opportunities to Turkanas to eliminate poverty. Yet, for decades their politicians have acted as if leadership is just about entitlement to endless relief food
No comments:
Post a Comment